ArticleScientific reports2026
Tree structural modeling from leaf-on point clouds for biomass carbon stock estimation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban trees represent valuable renewable biomass sources, but traditional allometric equations inadequately capture structural variability in urban environments. Therefore, considering tree structure is crucial for accurate biomass measurement. While LiDAR-based 3D modeling can reflect tree architecture, generating reliable models from dense foliage point clouds has remained difficult. To address this challenge, we developed the Skeleton Generative Method (SkeletonGM), which reconstructs tree trunks and primary branches from mobile laser scanning data even under heavy foliation. SkeletonGM produces a clarified skeletal point cloud that is subsequently converted into 3D tree models using AdTree; aboveground woody biomass is then calculated by combining the estimated volume with species-specific wood density. To validate the proposed method, we applied SkeletonGM to 33 hinoki cypress trees in a forest stand and 25 dawn redwood trees in a park, and compared the resulting biomass estimates with values derived from allometric equations. The results showed strong agreement with the reference equations (R² = 0.95 and 0.94; mean absolute percentage error = 14.1% and 14.6%). These findings indicate that the proposed method has strong potential to improve the accuracy of biomass assessment for urban trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.