ArticleScientific reports2026
Environmental and energy performance of cotton stalk residues for sustainable bioenergy production.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the energy and environmental performance of cotton stalk residues as a process-level solid bioenergy resource using a gate-to-gate analytical framework. Briquettes were produced under varying particle sizes (≤ 0.7–3 mm), compaction pressures (3–16 MPa), and moisture contents (6–15%). The characterization included density, total specific energy consumption (SECT), calorific value, ash content, thermogravimetric behavior, and combustion emissions (CO₂, CO, SO₂, and NOx). To quantify the trade-off between densification energy demand and emission-related outputs, two composite indicators, the Energy Performance Index (EPI) and the Environmental Impact Index for Energy (EIIE) were applied and interpreted strictly within a process-level context. The results showed that high briquette density (up to 1180 kg·m⁻³), a gross calorific value of 18.64 MJ·kg⁻¹, and low ash content (3.4%) can be achieved under suitable compaction conditions, while combustion emissions were dominated by CO₂ with comparatively low levels of other pollutants. Optimal energy and environmental performance at the process level was observed at moderate moisture contents and coarser particle sizes, reflecting a balance between mechanical energy input and fuel quality. Overall, the findings indicate that cotton stalk residues can be converted into operationally efficient solid biofuels with favorable process-level emission characteristics, supporting their valorization in waste-to-energy applications. The study further presents a novel process-level integrated assessment that quantitatively links densification energy demand, fuel energy output, and combustion-related emissions through composite performance indicators (EPI and EIIE).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.