Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965901›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Simultaneous multi-controller fusion via genetic algorithm-optimized weighted summation for variable-speed wind turbine control.

Aziz Chahbi, Mourad Yessef, Amine Amharech, Saad F Al-Gahtani, Z M S El-Barbary, Hatim Ameziane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aziz ChahbiScience and Technology for the Engineer Laboratory (LaSTI), ENSA Khouribga, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Khouribga, Morocco.
Mourad YessefHigher School of Technology of Nador (ESTN), Mohammed First University of Oujda, Nador, 62000, Morocco. m.yessef@ump.ac.ma.
Amine AmharechScience and Technology for the Engineer Laboratory (LaSTI), ENSA Khouribga, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Khouribga, Morocco.
Saad F Al-GahtaniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Z M S El-BarbaryDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Hatim AmezianeScience and Technology for the Engineer Laboratory (LaSTI), ENSA Khouribga, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Khouribga, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although individual controllers have been frequently studied across several research fields, the synergistic combination of multiple control strategies is still mostly unexplored. This paper introduces and develops an advanced hybrid parallel controller (HPC) in which Proportional-integral (PI), Sliding Mode (SMC), and Backstepping (BSC) controllers operate concurrently and contribute simultaneously to the generation of the optimal signal command through weighted-summation. The motivation stems from an extensive concept that the suggested HPC architecture benefits from the complementary nature of these controllers, where each controller’s strengths compensate for the others’ weaknesses. PI offers a null steady-state error, SMC ensures excellent robustness and fast disturbance rejection, and BSC delivers Lyapunov-based stability for nonlinear dynamics. The HPC’s performance is evaluated using four manually configured weight settings designed to compare HPC’s performance to that of pure controllers and investigate the effect of weight distribution on HPC’s control behavior. Subsequently, a genetic algorithm (GA) is applied to determine the optimal weight distribution. Extensive Matlab/Simulink simulations have been carried out on a 1.5 MW wind turbine under different operating conditions. The results demonstrate that the developed HPC outperforms all pure controllers with an ITAE improvement ranging from 58 to 75.57%, while the GA-optimized HPC (HPC-GA) further outperforms all manually tuned configurations, showing more than 83% reduction in ITAE, with physically significant trends: SMC and BSC contributions increase with parameter changes, on the other hand PI contribution decreases until complete elimination at the most disturbing conditions, demonstrating that the GA serves as a discovery mechanism for HPC.

Indexed as

Genetic algorithmHybrid parallel controllerIntelligent controlSystem controlWind turbine

Identifiers

PMID41965901
PMCPMC13230830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.