ArticleScientific reports2026
Strategies for designing informal learning spaces in libraries based on comprehensive field measurements of light, noise, thermal, and air quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As higher education increasingly emphasizes quality enhancement and innovative development, the importance of learning spaces is being recognized. The swift progress in information technology has also significantly altered learning methodologies, with informal learning becoming increasingly vital. The variety of spatial types and the intricate factors influencing informal learning spaces (ILS) can often result in interference among different elements, thereby undoubtedly escalating the complexity of research. The ILS within libraries has emerged as a research subject due to its exemplariness. To address this challenge, our study employed ultra-wideband (UWB) indoor positioning technology to conduct comprehensive research. This was achieved by gathering and analyzing data related to the indoor physical environment and user seating preferences, among other factors. We then established correlations between different data sets, considering the dimensions of time and space. This study constructed a multi-factor model influencing ILS and calculated the proportions of four decision-making elements using a comprehensive approach that included SPSS analysis and comparative scoring. Among these, physical elements topped the list, accounting for nearly 40% of student preferences. Following that, facilities elements contributed to over 20% of preferences. Ontology elements (macro layout, functional zoning, and form composition) explained over 15% of preferences, and lastly, atmosphere elements (> 10%). The study identified 7 key bottom-level indicators and their respective weights for each ILS type, and proposed improvement methods for them, aiming to offer reference and support for future ILS design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.