ArticleScientific reports2026
YOLO-AMI: enhancing online quality monitoring in 3D printing with composite loss and parameter-free attention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) is transforming industrial production; however, inevitable defects-such as spaghetti-like collapses, surface blemishes ("zits"), and stringing-substantially degrade product quality and mechanical performance. To overcome limitations of traditional inspection methods-often inefficient, subjective, or reliant on costly offline equipment-a high-precision, real-time defect-detection model, YOLO-AMI, is proposed, based on the YOLOv10 architecture. The neck network was reconstructed using the Asymptotic Feature Pyramid Network to enhance multi-scale feature fusion and suppress background noise. In addition, a parameter-free attention mechanism was integrated to adaptively emphasize critical features without increasing computational complexity. To improve detection of small defects, a composite loss function combining Normalized Wasserstein Distance and Intersection over Union was adopted. Experimental evaluation on a dataset of 6,000 AM images shows that YOLO-AMI attains a mean average precision (mAP@0.5) of 85.5%, precision of 87.1%, and recall of 83.2%, outperforming state-of-the-art models such as YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and RT-DETR-L. With an inference speed of 105.6 frames per second and a compact model size of 8.6 million parameters, the proposed approach achieves a favorable balance between accuracy and efficiency, providing a robust solution for intelligent online quality monitoring in Industry 4.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.