ArticleNature communications2026
Characterizing gene perturbations in single cells via network divergence analysis.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterizing gene perturbations in single cells via network divergence analysis.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional perturbations of genes do not always cause expression changes, but can manifest through network rewiring or context-specific shifts in regulatory activity. However, inferring functional shifts in genes and linking them to the specific cell populations remains challenging, as most current scRNA-seq data analysis focuses either on differential gene expression or on cell abundance/state changes, but rarely associate gene perturbations with particular cell populations. Here we present scDNS, a framework that quantifies gene-specific functional perturbations by measuring information-theoretic divergence between condition-specific gene interaction network configurations. In simulated stress tests and multiple experimental datasets, scDNS prioritizes key regulators and perturbed cell populations, even when expression changes are minimal but network rewiring is pronounced. Applications to immunodeficiency mutations, stimulus responses, and viral infection reveal hidden regulatory programs and heterogeneous responder cell states. In pancreatic cancer, scDNS nominates TIMM44 as a mitochondrial sensitizer enhancing gemcitabine efficacy. Together, scDNS provides a powerful tool for inferring dynamic gene perturbations in single cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.