Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965845›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

KiVa-SEND: protocol for a two-arm feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of an adapted anti-bullying programme for special schools.

Julia R Badger, Lucy Bowes, Christina Salmivalli, Ariel Lindorff, Caitlin Murray, Richard P Hastings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia R BadgerDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Julia.badger@education.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-1934
Lucy BowesDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-3875
Christina SalmivalliINVEST Research Flagship Centre and Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Ariel LindorffDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6147-6289
Caitlin MurrayDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7547-736X
Richard P HastingsSchool of Policy and Society, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-8270

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBullying is a public health risk with rates amongst pupils in mainstream school estimated to be about 20-30%. This increases to approximately 25-69% amongst pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Combined bullying data from two large studies of children and young people from 144 countries found that the greatest risk factor to becoming a victim of bullying was being 'different' to one's peers. These differences included factors such as physical appearance, physical disability or learning disability. Yet there are currently no evidence-based anti-bullying programmes designed specifically for pupils in special schools, and therefore no randomised controlled trials. This study adapted KiVa - an established and evidence-based Finnish anti-bullying programme of ten, 1.5 h lessons that can be embedded into a school curriculum - into KiVa-SEND, by adjusting the language, activities and teaching delivery.

methodsA two-arm feasibility cluster interventional randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 blocked randomisation allocation ratio of schools and an embedded process evaluation. Data will be collected at baseline and at a 12-month follow-up. Eight UK special education schools will participate with between 128 and 384 pupils and between 16 and 96 teachers completing the data questionnaires. A further three to six teachers and up to 10 pupils will participate in the process evaluation interviews or Talking Mats. Talking Mats is a visual tool to support individuals who struggle with communication, to express their thoughts and emotions. Four schools will be allocated to implement KiVa-SEND across the academic year 2025/26 in addition to anti-bullying practice as usual, and four schools will continue with usual practice alone. Primary outcomes will be feasibility outcomes on the topics of recruitment and retention, adherence, staff surveys, pupil surveys and pupil attendance. Secondary outcomes will focus on pupil survey data, teacher survey data, and the differences between KiVa-SEND and the schools' current anti-bullying programmes. The process evaluation will focus on the topics of recruitment and retention, implementation and adherence of the adapted KiVa programme, engagement and acceptability of/to pupils and staff, and suitability of the outcome measures. DISCUSSION: This feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation will evaluate the feasibility of delivering KiVa-SEND within a variety of UK special schools, the acceptance of the materials, and the suitability of the outcome measures, for pupils aged 7-14 with a range of primary educational needs and learning disabilities. This will inform the feasibility to later conduct a definitive randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of KiVa-SEND.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN15516577. Registered 31 March 2025 before any data collection, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15516577 .

Indexed as

Anti-bullyingChildrenIntellectual disabilitiesInterventionKiVaRandomised controlled trialSENDYoung people

Identifiers

PMID41965845
PMCPMC13188377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.