ArticleNature communications2026
Exploring the feasible net-zero transition pathway in China considering energy system flexibility.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Net-zero energy transition is projected to accelerate the replacement of fossil fuels with renewables, leaving system flexibility resources increasingly scarce. Here, we present a sub-annual energy-environment-economy model with endogenous hourly energy demand profiles and power balance dynamics including power dispatch, storage operations and demand-side response that co-optimizes supply- and demand-side flexibility, to map feasible transition pathways for China. The results show that compared with coarser timeslice representative of common modelling practice, sub-annual representation tightening flexibility needs with a high variable renewable energy and high electrification energy system. Results reveal steeper load ramps and frequent evening price strikes, identify increased activities in thermal power, nuclear power, hydrogen production, and energy storage. Accounting for temporal variability in supply and demand, the cost-optimal solution exhibits marginal abatement costs that are over 9% higher, but incorporating demand-side flexibility measures can mitigate cost growth and delineates least-regret portfolios for reliable, affordable decarbonization. Incentives for demand-side response such as load time-shifting and vehicle-to-grid can reduce investment in pumped hydro by 23% and yield more than a threefold cost-benefit ratio. The study highlights enhanced modelling of temporal dynamics within future energy model development and incentive-compatible market mechanism design for dispatchable resource development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.