Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965813›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative seismic performance of steel EBF shear links frame designed to IS 18168:2023 using force-based and direct displacement method.

Bush Rc, Venkata Vamsi Emani, Ahmad Batah, Mohamed F Suleiman, Rajneesh Sharma, Varsha Rani, Rohit Vyas, Abdullah Ansari, Pranjal Mandhaniya, Ayed E Alluqmani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bush RcDepartment of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, 302017, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 2021rce9516@mnit.ac.in.
Venkata Vamsi EmaniAguirre Project Resources LLC, 75068, Texas, USA.
Ahmad BatahDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, USA.
Mohamed F SuleimanCivil Engineering Department, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya.
Rajneesh SharmaDept. Of Civil Engineering), Engineering College Jhalawar, Jhalawar, India.
Varsha RaniGovernment Polytechnic, Purnea, Bihar, India. varsharani085@gmail.com.
Rohit VyasDepartment of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, 302017, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Abdullah AnsariEarthquake Monitoring Center, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Al Khoudh, PC: 123, Oman. a.ansari@squ.edu.om.
Pranjal MandhaniyaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway. pranjal.mandhaniya@ntnu.no.
Ayed E AlluqmaniDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Madinah, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah, Medina, Saudi Arabia. aayed@iu.edu.sa.
Anoop I ShirkolDepartment of Civil Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, 302017, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent introduction of IS 18168:2023 marks a significant advancement in the seismic design of steel structures in India by providing dedicated provisions for eccentrically braced frames (EBFs). While the code promotes link-controlled energy dissipation, its performance under different design philosophies, particularly in the nonlinear range, remains largely unexplored. This study presents a comprehensive seismic performance evaluation of steel EBF buildings designed as per IS 18168:2023 using conventional Force-Based Design (FBD) and Direct Displacement-Based Design (DDBD) approaches. The nonlinear static pushover analysis, nonlinear time-history analysis, and incremental dynamic analysis are performed for four building heights of 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-storey. In addition, various important response parameters, including inter-storey drift, link rotation, plastic hinge distribution, variability, and collapse-related behaviour, have been systematically examined. Based on the results, it has been confirmed that EBF systems designed according to IS 18,168 exhibit a stable and desirable seismic behaviour, with inelastic deformation pretty much localized in the shear links. With respect to FBD, however, DDBD provides stronger control over nonlinear response due to approximately 20–40% lower median drift demands, 30–50% reduction at critical link rotation in MCE level, and strongly reduced record-to-record variability. Further, the drift escalation in DDBD frames is delayed while collapse robustness is notably improved, particularly for the midand high-rise buildings. Overall, the study brings out that though IS 18,168 provides a robust codal framework in the design of EBF systems, integrating DDBD within this codal context further leads to a more realistic, predictable, and performanceoriented seismic response, especially under strong ground motions.

Indexed as

Direct Displacement-Based Design (DDBD)Eccentrically Braced Frames (EBFs)IS 18168:2023Nonlinear Dynamic AnalysisSeismic Performance Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41965813
PMCPMC13230759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.