ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
Calorimetry informed visual digital model for continuous flow photobromination.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calorimetry data for continuous-flow photochemistry are scarce, hindering kinetic model development and safe scale-up. Here we show that in situ calorimetry combined with designed experiments enables a quantitative, heat-consistent kinetic description for the continuous-flow photobromination of (E)-methyl 2-(methoxyimino)-2-(o-tolyl) acetate (EMMA). We record total heat release, conversion, and selectivity over defined windows of residence time and light intensity, and fit a two-step kinetic scheme constrained by the calorimetric heat-release data. The model predicts total heat with R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.