ArticleScientific reports2026
Phylogeography of Heteropriacanthus, a circumtropical reef fish with very little morphological variation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Only six species of fishes found on reefs are known to have a circumtropical distribution. Until recently Heteropriacanthus cruentatus was one of the six, recognized as a single species in a monotypic genus present in all tropical and subtropical seas. Based on sequences of cytochrome oxidase I and on morphology, a previous study split the genus into three species, H. carolinus in the Indo-Pacific, H. cruentatus in most of the tropical Atlantic, and H. fulgens in the northeast Atlantic. We sampled two mitochondrial and three nuclear genes (a total of 3618 bases) from 21 locations in three oceans to determine the phylogeography and genetic structure of the genus. We found three clades, corresponding to H. cruentatus, H. fulgens, and H. carolinus. H. fulgens extends, not just to the northeastern Atlantic as previously known, but also to the southeast, the central and (possibly) the southwest Atlantic, whereas H. cruentatus is restricted to the Greater Caribbean. H. carolinus spreads in the entire Indo-Pacific. We found no evidence that the three species are sympatric anywhere in their range. H. cruentatus is genetically homogeneous over its small range, but H. fulgens shows evidence of gene flow restrictions between the northeast and the southeast Atlantic and between the east and the central Atlantic. Genetic exchange in H. carolinus is restricted by the large expanse of open water between the eastern and the central Pacific (the 4000 km wide Eastern Pacific Barrier), and by either distance or historical separation between the Pacific and the Indian Oceans. There is evidence of isolation by distance in H. carolinus, but not in H. fulgens or H. cruentatus. A coalescent Bayesian Analysis also supported a stepping stone model in H. carolinus and indicated that gene flow through the Eastern Pacific Barrier was mostly eastwards, whereas it was westwards between the central and western Pacific. Genetic exchange was high and symmetrical between the western Pacific and the Indian Ocean. Thus, despite the remarkably low morphological variation of Heteropriacanthus, its phylogeography shows that gene flow is restricted by some of the major barriers to dispersal for marine organisms. Nevertheless, the observed degree of connectivity across the width of the Indo-Pacific is remarkable for a reef fish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.