ArticleScientific reports2026
AI enhanced optimization of college physical education programs using hybrid genetic algorithms and learning based fitness evaluation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structured physical education (PE) programs are essential for fostering students' physical development, cognitive performance, and emotional well-being in academic settings. This study introduces a novel intelligent decision-making algorithm (IDA) for the dynamic optimization and real-time assessment of college PE programs. The proposed framework synergistically integrates a hybrid genetic algorithm (GA) that is viable global optimizer with pattern search (PS) that is an adaptive local search technique. The exploration in the search domain is performed with GA while PS exploitation in a minimal computational budget is performed by the PS. The system encodes program performance data into chromosome-like representations, enabling nuanced evaluation across academic progress, health indices, and affective-psychomotor domains. A tailored vector of weight factors refines the fitness function to reflect individual learning trajectories and institutional goals. Experimental results demonstrate that the model achieves a high prediction accuracy of 98%, with quantifiable improvements of 151.13% in holistic performance, 19.63% in educational metrics, and 26.7% in psychomotor development as compared with reported results. Comparative models, including Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and RF regression, that achieved accuracies of 88.21%, 94.49%, and 82%, respectively. The hybrid framework maintained a mean global fitness value of 5.3451 × 10⁻¹² with an average computational time of 1357.04 s over 100 runs that is used to validate the reliability of the proposed framework. By enhancing efficiency and reducing computational complexity, this AI-driven evaluation model offers a scalable and intelligent approach for real-time optimization and policy refinement in higher education PE curriculum planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.