ArticleBDJ open2026
Knowledge, attitude, and practice in diagnostic dental radiology: an Egyptian survey with a global perspective.
Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMany surveys report less than optimum knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of dental imaging for patient and operator safety. This study aimed to assess the KAP for diagnostic imaging among dentists in light of global practices and recent recommendations.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire that was electronically distributed through dental social media platforms between March 1st and June 30th, 2022. Forty-seven questions evaluating demographics, knowledge, practice, and attitude were included. The survey targeted Egyptian dentists practicing in Egypt.
resultsTwo hundred and twenty-eight dentists of different specialties responded. Fifty-nine percent of the dentists were not familiar with the ALARA principle. Fifty-three percent never use lead aprons. Dentists (16.6%) who practiced in facilities with cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCTs) showed significantly (p = 0.000) higher knowledge scores (7.89 ± 2.63) than those who didn't have CBCTs (6.16 ± 2.67). There was no statistical difference in training received (p = 0.345) between the different specialties. Most dentists (79.4%) were interested in increasing their knowledge of radiation safety.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, there is a need to educate dentists on radiation hazards, child-sized imaging protocols, and how to implement the ALARA principle. Training materials freely available on reliable websites should be disseminated. Regulations should include auditing referrals and periodic calibration of X-ray units.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.