ArticleScientific reports2026
Genome concatenation enables accurate dual RNA-seq mapping for lignocellulolytic fungi in coculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dual RNA-seq enables simultaneous transcriptome profiling of interacting organisms, yet accurate read assignment remains challenging, particularly in fungal cocultures where phylogenetic proximity and high percentages of homologous sequences can be shared. Here, we evaluate two mapping strategies for dual RNA-seq analysis of Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and Pleurotus citrinopileatus cocultivated on sugarcane bagasse, based on a sequential alignment against individual genomes and a concatenated reference genome approach. Illumina NovaSeq sequencing generated 175 million high-quality reads, with mapping rates exceeding 96% across all strategies. No significant differences were observed between mapping strategies or genome order in the sequential approach (p = 0.976 and p = 1.0, respectively). Cross-mapping and multimapping rates were uniformly low (< 2% and < 1.7%, respectively), consistent with the substantial evolutionary divergence between the two fungi, and ensuring that read assignment to each genome was not significantly affected. The concatenated strategy reduced computational time by ~ 93% and yielded slightly more balanced genome-specific read assignments and lower multimapping frequencies. Together, these results demonstrate that concatenated genome mapping offers an efficient and accurate framework for resolving mixed fungal transcriptomes, appropriate for investigation of coculture systems and gene expression modulation during the degradation of lignocellulosic biomass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.