ArticleBMC medical education2026
A longitudinal descriptive analysis of medical student attitudes, emotional responses, and coping strategies during body donor dissection.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile human body donor dissection facilitates foundational experiences that enable medical students to appreciate anatomical structures, it can also be a source of emotional stress that may hinder their learning process. The current longitudinal study aimed to describe students’ emotional responses and attitudes toward body donor dissection and to analyze how these responses changed over time. In addition, self-reported coping strategies used by students during the dissection course were explored.
methodsStudents were surveyed three times throughout the anatomy course: once before comencing dissection, once immediately following the first dissection session, and once upon completing the final dissection session.
resultsResults indicated that prior to beginning dissection most students (68.7%) reported feelings of curiosity and interest; however, the number of students reporting these feelings noticeably declined by the end of the sessions to 48%. In addition, nervousness and anxiety fell between the first survey and the second with a slight rebound in the final survey. Students noted that smell became a stronger stressor over time, rising from 63.9% initially to 78% by the end of the dissection sessions. Furthermore, discomfort associated with touching certain parts of the body significantly increased over time from 48% to 76% (p = 0.039). The dissection workload was also noted as a prevalent stressor after students commenced the dissection sessions (p = 0.004). The most frequently reported coping strategies were talking with a close friend and prayer; however, reported use of these coping mechanisms also decreased over time.
conclusionAs there is evidence of a need for emotional support, the authors suggest the development of curricular strategies to support student emotional preparedness both inside and outside of the anatomy laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.