ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2026
A lifeline on wheels: perspectives of stakeholders on the implementation and impact of a mobile medications for opioid use disorder unit.
Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMobile health units (MHUs) providing medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) have emerged as a critical strategy to address gaps in opioid treatment access, particularly for marginalized populations. Research has yet to explore stakeholder perspectives on MHUs' implementation, challenges, and long-term sustainability.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 stakeholders, including MHU staff, administrators, community partners, and policymakers. Interviews explored experiences with the MHU, barriers and facilitators to patient engagement, and operational challenges. Data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using a template thematic approach to identify key themes related to implementation and sustainability.
resultsStakeholders endorsed the MHU as a highly accessible and flexible intervention that reduces barriers for people experiencing homelessness, economic instability, and transportation limitations. The MHU facilitated strong patient-provider relationships and access to harm reduction, primary care, and social services. Challenges included staffing shortages, inconsistent funding, limited clinical space, and environmental barriers. Additionally, stigma, political resistance, and law enforcement interactions affected service delivery and patient engagement. DISCUSSION: Findings highlight the importance of policy and funding mechanisms to ensure the long-term viability of MHUs. Stakeholders recommended expanding outreach, increasing staffing, and integrating additional services. Addressing these challenges is essential to sustaining MHUs as an effective public health intervention for opioid use disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.