ReviewBiomedical engineering online2026
Artificial intelligence in microbiology: implications for metagenomics, diagnostics, and AMR surveillance.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Convergent methodologies in prosthetic joint infection research: integrating transdisciplinary approaches to understand and prevent biofilm-driven failure of orthopaedic prostheses.Journal of medical microbiology · 2026Review
- Improving the Precision of Etiological Diagnosis in Bacterial Infections Using Molecular Technologies: A Comparative Analysis of Platforms, AI Integration, and Point-of-Care Deployment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is now a key player in modern microbiology, as it enables high-resolution analyses of genomic, metagenomic, and clinical data for the monitoring of infectious disease and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Considerable advancements in deep learning, transformer-based sequence models, graph neural networks, and multimodal architectures have greatly improved microbial classification accuracy, antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) detection, and resistance prediction. Taking metagenomic sequencing into consideration, these advancements have contributed to the development of sensitive, scalable, and non-invasive methods to profile microbiomes, determine novel resistance, and monitor AMR trends at the population level. This review summarizes recent advances in AI-aided microbiology, with a particular emphasis on AMR surveillance. Specific topics include deep learning frameworks for ARG annotation, emerging approaches to identifying new resistance genes, and multimodal applications (genomic and clinical metadata) aimed at improving phenotype prediction. The role of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) to enhance AMR surveillance efforts is noted, along with their noted limitations relative to isolate genomes. The discussion includes the examination of explainable AI (XAI) techniques including SHAP, attention mechanism approaches, and gradient-based attribution approaches, with the aim of increasing transparency and clinical explainability. We also cover potential applications including AI-enabled non-invasive fecal microbiome diagnostics, laboratory automation, and environmental surveillance. While there has been significant progress, unresolved issues exist relating to dataset variations, liability of models to datasets, interpretability, and regulatory approval. Overcoming these barriers, however, will require standardized frameworks for these workflows, privacy-preserving federated learning methods, and interpretable AI frameworks for clinical and public health tools. AI could fundamentally change AMR surveillance by allowing for earlier resistance detection, advanced risk assessment recommendation, and improved monitoring strategies globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.