ArticleBMC medical education2026
Medical students' attitudes toward patient safety and medical error reporting in Syria.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient safety is a core competency in medical education, yet evidence from conflict-affected and low-resource settings remains limited. This study assessed patient safety attitudes among undergraduate medical students in Syria and identified predictors of overall attitudes and error reporting behavior.
methodsA multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical students from four Syrian universities using the Attitudes to Patient Safety Questionnaire-III (APSQ-III). Descriptive statistics, group comparisons, hierarchical regression, and binary logistic regression were performed.
resultsOf 1,342 students, the mean APSQ-III score was 4.8 ± 0.67 (positive attitudes). Highest scores were observed for team functioning and working hours as error cause; lowest for professional incompetence as error cause. Although 38.5% witnessed a medical error, only 11.0% reported it. Higher overall attitudes were independently associated with female gender, higher GPA, pre-clinical stage, and having reported an error. Error reporting was predicted by female gender, clinical stage, higher GPA, and higher scores in error reporting confidence and disclosure responsibility.
conclusionSyrian medical students hold positive patient safety attitudes, but a substantial gap exists in error reporting behavior. Strengthening longitudinal safety education, systems thinking, and supportive non-punitive environments may bridge this gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.