Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965735›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Desirability and feasibility of value-based healthcare in the Dutch Military Health System: a cross-sectional study.

Henk van der Wal, Fleur Maas, Iris Dijksma, Jan Hazelzet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henk van der WalTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. h.vanderwal.1@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7551-2842
Fleur MaasDefence Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defence, P.O. Box 90004, Utrecht, 3509 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7021-1319
Iris DijksmaDefence Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defence, P.O. Box 90004, Utrecht, 3509 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-5070
Jan HazelzetDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9414-5539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValue-Based Healthcare (VBHC) emphasises delivering high-quality care measured by patient outcomes rather than the volume of services. Although mostly partially implemented in civilian health systems, VBHC integration within military health systems (MHS) lags behind. Given current geopolitical developments and the unique operational demands of military healthcare, this study aimed to assess the desirability and feasibility of implementing VBHC in the Dutch MHS.

methodsA cross-sectional, descriptive survey was conducted in 2024 among active-duty personnel in the Netherlands Armed Forces. Stratified sampling targeted three stakeholder groups—care recipients, care providers, and care facilitators—followed by voluntary response recruitment. A self-administered online questionnaire assessed familiarity with VBHC, perceived desirability and feasibility of its implementation, and prioritised components for application. The survey was structured around case-based scenarios derived from the Linnean VBHC framework, adapted to the military context. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Likert-scale medians; open-ended responses were analysed thematically.

resultsOf 912 eligible participants, 290 completed the survey (32% response rate), comprised of 45% care recipients, 33% care providers, and 22% care facilitators. Most respondents (67%) had over 15 years of military service; 58% held higher education degrees. Familiarity with VBHC increased throughout the survey. Overall, 96% of respondents perceived VBHC as valuable for the Dutch MHS. Notably, 64% believed VBHC could benefit both regular and operational care. A collaborative implementation approach involving all three stakeholder groups was preferred by 82%. However, concerns were raised about feasibility in large-scale combat operations, highlighting the need to align VBHC components with military readiness and mission-critical objectives.

conclusionThis study provides initial evidence supporting broad acceptance of VBHC within the Dutch MHS, particularly for non-operational military healthcare contexts. While desirability was high, practical applicability raised concerns, especially regarding combat and operational care settings. These findings suggest the potential for VBHC integration, but emphasize the necessity for a military-specific adaptation. Future research should explore targeted implementation strategies that balance patient-centered outcomes with the unique operational demands of military healthcare environments.

Indexed as

Military Health ServicesMilitary PersonnelValue-Based Health CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesDesirabilityFamiliarityFeasibilityLarge-scale combat operationsMilitary health systemOutcomesPatient-centred careTrauma careValue-based healthcareVBHC

Identifiers

PMID41965735
PMCPMC13196245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.