SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Influence of manufacturer, laboratory, clinical, and aging-related factors on the mechanical properties of multilayered zirconia: a systematic review of laboratory studies.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically review laboratory studies evaluating how multilayering technologies, laboratory and clinical factors, and aging processes affect the mechanical properties of multilayered zirconia.
methodsThis review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English-language, peer-reviewed laboratory studies published between January 1, 2014, and September 11, 2025. Studies were included if they assessed multilayered zirconia and reported at least one mechanical property. Exclusion criteria included non-laboratory studies, studies focused solely on optical properties or microstructure/composition without mechanical testing, and studies lacking clear descriptions of multilayer technology.
resultsThe search identified 615 records; 106 full-text articles were evaluated based on eligibility criteria. Ultimately, 58 studies were included. Different mechanical-related properties were assessed, including flexural strength, compressive strength, fracture load, fracture toughness, hardness, elastic modulus, fatigue resistance, wear resistance, and structural reliability metrics. Key influencing factors on the mechanical properties of multilayered zirconia were manufacturer-related (yttria and pigment gradients), laboratory-related (sintering parameters, CAD/CAM strategies/disc positioning, prosthesis design, coloring, surface treatments), clinical (occlusal thickness, finish line design, cementation protocol, core build-up materials, tooth substrate), and aging conditions.
conclusionThe mechanical properties of multilayered zirconia are affected by yttria distribution, multilayering strategy, prosthesis design, sintering parameters, surface treatment, and aging conditions. Higher yttria content enhances translucency but reduces flexural strength and fracture toughness. While composition-gradient systems often demonstrated higher strength under controlled conditions, no multilayering approach showed definitive mechanical superiority. Methodological heterogeneity and moderate risk of bias warrant cautious interpretation. Standardized laboratory protocols and long-term clinical studies are needed to establish more definitive performance profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.