ArticleBMC psychology2026
Barriers of spiritual care in nursing: a scoping review.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpirituality is regarded as a fundamental aspect of humanity and is acknowledged by numerous healthcare professionals as a vital element in health and healing. Researchers have emphasized the importance of spiritual nursing care as a core aspect of nursing practice, highlighting the need to nurture the human spirit through the establishment of relationships and connections between nurses and patients. Nevertheless, despite the acknowledged significance of spiritual practices for health, there has been limited focus on spirituality within nursing practice and education in existing literature. This review aimed to identify the barriers that hinder the integration of spiritual care into nursing practice. Findings were organized using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) as a post-hoc analytical framework to systematically categorize barriers across multiple levels of influence.
methodsA scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A total of 26 studies were identified from the existing literature concerning the barriers to providing spiritual care in nursing. These barriers are categorized into five main themes using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) as a post-hoc analytical organizing framework. The scoping review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.
resultsFive primary themes were identified across the Socio-Ecological Model levels. Individual barriers enclosed nurses’ personal knowledge gaps, discomfort, and spiritual self-awareness deficits, as well as clients’ reluctance to engage. Interpersonal barriers included religious sensitivity, cultural competence challenges, and communication difficulties. Organizational, community, and policy-level barriers further hindered the integration of spiritual care into nursing practice.
conclusionsThe primary barriers to providing spiritual care in nursing stem from the lack of visibility associated with this aspect of care within the profession. This review highlighted barriers faced by nursing professionals in delivering spiritual care to clients with concept of SEM, which need to be addressed in order to enhance the level and quality of spiritual care nursing. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating multilevel interventions targeting barriers at individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy levels, with particular emphasis on integrating spiritual care education into nursing curricula and establishing supportive institutional policies across diverse cultural and healthcare contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.