ArticleReproductive health2026
Development of a food security assessment tool for prenatal care in pregnant women: a mixed-method study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen have more complex nutritional needs due to menstrual cycles, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. They are the most vulnerable group in terms of household food insecurity. Until now, public tools used to assess the food security of pregnant women. This study aims to develop and validate a food security assessment tool specifically for pregnant women to integrate into antenatal care in the health system.
methodsA sequential-exploratory mixed-method design was implemented. In the qualitative phase, 23 in-depth semi-structured interviews with 17 pregnant women and 6 food security experts were analysed using conventional content analysis to define the concept and dimensions of food security during pregnancy. Based on these findings and a structured instrument-development framework, an initial item pool was generated and evaluated through face validity, content validity, item analysis, and construct validity assessments. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with a sample of 300 pregnant women, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in an independent sample of 150 women. Reliability (Cronbach’s alpha, ICC), responsiveness, feasibility, and known-group validity were also examined.
resultsEFA supported a two-factor structure explaining 63.9% of the variance. CFA demonstrated acceptable model fit (χ².df = 1.71, CFI = 0.953, IFI = 0.953, RMSEA = 0.069). The final 20-item Pregnancy Food Security Questionnaire (Pregnancy-FSQ) exhibited excellent internal consistency (α = 0.965) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.999). Known-group validity was confirmed through significant score differences across maternal education, household income, occupation, and place of residence (p < 0.001). The tool showed minimal nonresponse, required approximately 15 min to complete, and demonstrated adequate responsiveness to socio-demographic disparities associated with food insecurity.
conclusionsThe Pregnancy-FSQ is a valid, reliable, and feasible instrument specifically designed to assess food security among pregnant women. Its integration into routine antenatal care can support early identification of food-insecure pregnant women and indirectly highlight food-insecure households, facilitating timely interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.