ArticleMalaria journal2026
Seasonal variation in aquatic habitat availability and use by the malaria vector, Anopheles funestus.
Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarval source management (LSM) can be highly effective for controlling malaria vectors such as Anopheles funestus s.s., which typically exploit large and permanent aquatic habitats. While these habitats can persist year-round in endemic regions of Africa, their availability and use shift between wet and dry seasons. Understanding these seasonal changes is essential for identifying the habitats that sustain vector populations and for determining when and where LSM would be most effective.
methodsWe investigated the availability and use of An. funestus larval habitats across wet and dry seasons in south-eastern Tanzania, and the environmental factors that influence these patterns. Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in five villages during the dry season (September-November 2021) and rainy season (February-May 2022) to map and characterize aquatic habitats and identify those colonized by An. funestus.
resultsIn total, 2824 aquatic habitats were identified, of which 27% were positive for An. funestus. Remotely sensed land cover data and directly measured habitat characteristics were incorporated into generalized linear mixed models to evaluate seasonal and environmental predictors of larval presence and abundance. Larval occurrence and density were significantly influenced by habitat type, village, season, and their interactions, as well as by key physicochemical factors including water depth, vegetation type, algae, water clarity, and water source. An. funestus was commonly found in river streams, ground pools, and ditches across both seasons. During the wet season, however, it also occupied spring-fed wells, rice fields, and dug pits, indicating broader habitat use.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate a clear seasonal shift in larval habitat use by An. funestus, reflecting its ecological adaptability. While the species generally favors permanent habitats, its expanded use of diverse sites in the wet season has important implications for LSM. Targeting persistent habitats during the dry season may offer a more efficient and feasible window for implementing this intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.