Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965683›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

The application of artificial intelligence in the design of highly compatible knee prostheses: a systematic review.

Kangpeng Li, Ti Zhang, Xinguang Wang, Feng Li, Hua Tian

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kangpeng Li *Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ti Zhang *Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xinguang Wang *Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100191, China.
Feng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100191, China. fengli@bjmu.edu.cn.
Hua TianDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100191, China. tianhua@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Project for Cultivating Innovative Pharmaceutical Products and Platforms 2241100009024023National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFB3814700)National Natural Science Foundation of China (82372450)Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality L234012Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (L254010)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, it has been widely used in the personalized design of orthopedic implants. Especially in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), AI has shown significant potential in prosthesis size prediction, implant identification and surgical planning. However, the research distribution in this field is scattered, the technical paths are diverse, and there is still a lack of systematic sorting and comprehensive evaluation.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve relevant literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 2025. Due to substantial heterogeneity across the included studies, a meta-analysis was not performed; instead, a descriptive synthesis approach was adopted. The inclusion criteria covered the application of AI in TKA prosthesis design, size prediction, type identification and surgical planning. Non-knee joint, non-quantitative research and review literature were excluded. A total of 16 studies were included. The descriptive comprehensive method was used to analyze the research characteristics, technical methods, application direction and performance.

resultsA total of 16 studies from 9 countries published between 2019 and 2025 were included. AI has been mainly applied in three directions in TKA prosthesis adaptation: prosthesis size prediction (12 articles), prosthesis type and manufacturer identification (4 articles), surgical planning and personalized design (4 articles). In size prediction, deep learning models, especially CNN, have excellent performance, with accuracy generally between 77 and 91%, and some models can reach more than 99% when allowing ± 1 size error. In the prosthesis recognition task, the model based on EfficientNet, YOLO and other architectures is close to perfect in terms of classification accuracy and AUC. In surgical planning and custom design, AI can automate the whole process from image segmentation to prosthesis generation, and the system processing time can be shortened to less than 15 mins. Despite the positive results, there are common limitations among studies, such as data heterogeneity, sample size differences, and insufficient clinical validation.

conclusionPreliminary evidence suggests that AI holds promise in improving preoperative planning accuracy and enabling personalized prosthesis design. However, high-level clinical validation is urgently needed to confirm its impact on long-term outcomes such as prosthesis survival and functional recovery.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeArtificial IntelligenceKnee ProsthesisProsthesis DesignHumansIntelligent SystemsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningKnee arthroplastyMachine learningProsthesis design

Identifiers

PMID41965683
PMCPMC13088457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.