ArticleBMC research notes2026
Design of a fixture for precise perpendicular cuts in bone-implant sample preparation.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultra-thin porous calcium phosphate coatings show extensive remodeling and high osseointegration after 24 weeks in a rabbit femoral condyle model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate specimen preparation is essential for biomechanical push-out testing of bone–implant interfaces. A common source of error arises when implants such as pins or screws are not cut exactly perpendicular to their axis. This results in oval or irregular cross-sections that compromise the validity of mechanical testing. In this study, we present a newly developed holder designed to ensure perpendicular sectioning of bone-anchored implants. Titanium pins coated with tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and GB14 were implanted in rabbit condyles and prepared for thin-section analysis using the Donath method. The roundness of implant cross-sections was quantitatively assessed with ImageJ (FIJI 1.53t) based on circularity and aspect ratio parameters. Compared with conventional freehand sectioning techniques, which exhibited a roundness of 0.83 ± 0.06 and an aspect ratio of 1.22 ± 0.09, the novel holder achieved markedly improved geometrical accuracy, with a roundness of 0.99 ± 0.002 and an aspect ratio of 1.003 ± 0.002. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). These results demonstrate that the device effectively minimizes geometric artifacts during sample preparation, thereby enhancing reproducibility and reliability in subsequent biomechanical testing. Although the validation was limited to rabbit condyles, the holder is a simple and versatile instrument with the potential for application across different implant types and experimental models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.