Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965665›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2026

Impact of interventions addressing perinatal mental health on loneliness and/or satisfaction with social support: systematic review.

Cristina Vasquez, Apphia Ruth D'souza, Rebecca Nowland, Billie Lever Taylor, Katherine Adlington, Eiluned Pearce, Alexandra Pitman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristina VasquezUCL Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9171-2879
Apphia Ruth D'souzaUCL Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-9843-2363
Rebecca NowlandSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4326-2425
Billie Lever TaylorUCL Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6865-3425
Katherine AdlingtonUCL Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9296-4952
Eiluned PearceUCL Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4347-317X
Alexandra PitmanUCL Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. a.pitman@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9742-1359

Funding

UK Research and Innovation ES/S004440/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLoneliness and low social support are associated with poor mental health in the perinatal period (pregnancy and one year postnatal). However, no reviews have explored systematically whether interventions aimed at improving perinatal mental health also improve loneliness and/or social support satisfaction (SSS). We aimed to address this gap in the literature, to improve our understanding of mechanisms underlying interventions addressing perinatal mental health and loneliness and/or SSS.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to address perinatal mental health and also measuring either loneliness or SSS. We searched six electronic databases and eight grey literature sources. Two reviewers independently screened papers for eligibility and assessed risk of bias. Findings were presented as a narrative synthesis.

resultsOf 6,422 unique retrieved records, we included 26 eligible studies (measuring both mental health and either loneliness or SSS). Of these, four studies measured mental health and loneliness, 21 measured mental health and SSS, and one measured mental health and both loneliness and SSS. Only eight of the 26 included studies were deemed to present low risk of bias. Of 17 included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), six identified significant improvements in loneliness/SSS compared to controls, but only three of these also identified significant improvements in anxiety and/or depression. Interventions with some evidence of effectiveness in improving loneliness/SSS were those facilitated by professionals, whilst those with some evidence of effectiveness in improving mental health were those that involved peer contact. Only one study conducted formal mediation analysis to delineate the pathways between these outcomes, finding no support for their hypothesis that an improvement in SSS mediates a reduction in depression.

conclusionWe found evidence that some (but not all) interventions that address perinatal mental health also improve loneliness and/or SSS. We found little empirical work to explain the pathways between these variables. Our findings suggest the need for further work exploring the relationships between loneliness/SSS and mental ill-health among perinatal parents. This will identify opportunities to prevent the onset or worsening of mental ill-health in parents (and their children) at risk of mental health problems.

Indexed as

LonelinessMental HealthPerinatal CarePersonal SatisfactionSocial SupportFemaleHumansPregnancyAnxietyDepressionLonelinessMental healthPerinatal careSocial supportSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41965665
PMCPMC13159232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.