ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurse-led enhanced recovery program for women undergoing elective cesarean section: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCesarean sections (CS), although commonly performed and generally considered safe, may be associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased postoperative pain, and a higher risk of complications. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP) on selected outcomes among women undergoing elective CS.
methodsA quasi-experimental study was conducted across inpatient and outpatient settings at Cairo University Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, including 90 women allocated into a study group (n = 45) and a control group (n = 45). Data was collected using structured interviews, numerical pain rating scale, postoperative recovery criteria, functional outcome assessment, and satisfaction questionnaire.
resultsBoth groups had comparable demographic characteristics. The ERP group demonstrated significantly better outcomes including reduced pain scores (2.71 vs. 4.26 at discharge, p < 0.001), faster ambulation (4.37 vs. 8.11 h), shorter hospital stays (9.22 vs. 11.88 h), and zero wound infections compared to 13.3% in controls. The intervention group showed higher satisfaction rates (33.3% vs. 8.9% completely satisfied) and greater functional outcomes in physical activities, self-care, and baby care 48 h post-discharge (p < 0.0001).
conclusionThe nurse-led ERP effectively improved post-cesarean outcomes, including pain control, recovery time, functional independence, and maternal satisfaction with self and infant care. The findings support integrating nurse-led ERP into cesarean section protocols across maternity hospitals to enhance maternal and neonatal outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.