ArticleVirology journal2026
Knockout of SIGLEC1 in pigs reduces porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome-1 (PRRSV-1) virus infection in primary macrophage cultures, but not in pigs.
Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Siglec-1, also known as sialoadhesin (Sn) or CD169, is a product of the SIGLEC1 gene. A large body of work performed on cell culture systems concludes that Siglec-1 is a primary receptor for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) isolates in the genotype 1 or PRRSV-1 group. In this study, primary cultures of PAMs from SIGLEC-1 knockout (KO) pigs showed resistance to infection using both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 isolates, which is consistent with previous observations. However, infection of KO and WT pigs with a PRRSV-1 isolate, SD01-08, resulted in viremia in both groups. Interestingly, virus nucleic acid levels in sera were significantly greater in the KO pigs at 21 and 28 days after infection. Mean virus load, calculated as area under the viremia curve over the infection period, was also significantly greater for the KO group. At the level of the pig, Siglec-1 as a receptor for PRRSV may not be biologically relevant. The increased viremia observed for the KO pigs may reflect a role for Siglec-1 in the regulation of the immune response to PRRSV-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.