Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965646›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Advancing knowledge translation processes in motor rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder: insights from a scoping review.

Léa Obrecht, Femke van Abswoude, Katrijn Klingels, Bert Steenbergen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Léa ObrechtBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands. lea.obrecht@ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4906-0886
Femke van AbswoudeBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-7129
Katrijn KlingelsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-9680
Bert SteenbergenBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-2624

Funding

European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement 101119878 - TReND
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly motor rehabilitation improves daily functioning and quality of life for children with cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder, but evidence-based practices are often underused in clinical settings. Knowledge translation supports the application of research findings into clinical practice, yet knowledge translation processes in paediatric motor rehabilitation are highly variable, and there is limited understanding of how they are designed or how clinicians and caregivers are engaged.

methodsFollowing a scoping review methodology, we identified studies on motor rehabilitation for children and adolescents (0–21 years) with cerebral palsy and/or developmental coordination disorder that reported on a knowledge translation process. Charted data included study characteristics, use of knowledge translation theory, and structure of the knowledge translation process. A narrative synthesis and content analysis were used to identify themes across studies.

resultsThis review included 17 articles. 14 studies reported using knowledge translation theories, most commonly the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) framework, though their application was selective and inconsistent. Knowledge translation steps were applied variably in number and sequence, spanning the creation of evidence to the assessment of its implementation, long-term outcomes measures were often missing. Clinicians were primarily engaged as data sources, using varied methods and timing. Self-reported measures of evidence-based practice knowledge and use were the most frequently measured outcomes.

conclusionsTo further understand knowledge translation in motor rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder, we need clearer reporting of decision-making within knowledge translation processes, more systematic application of theory, long-term study designs, and standardised methods for stakeholder engagement. Strengthening the practical relevance of knowledge translation in paediatric motor rehabilitation also requires greater recognition of clinicians’ and caregivers’ perspectives and their active engagement in decision-making. These improvements can support more consistent implementation of evidence-based motor rehabilitation practices and ultimately improve outcomes for children with cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyMotor Skills DisordersTranslational Research, BiomedicalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornYoung AdultCerebral palsyDevelopmental coordination disorderImplementation scienceKnowledge translationPaediatric motor rehabilitationScoping reviewStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID41965646
PMCPMC13195938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.