ArticleBMC public health2026
From stigma to support: exploring youth views on STI partner notification in Maseru, Lesotho.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) varies by region and gender, with the most significant impact observed in low-income countries where STI testing is infrequent, and treatment is primarily symptom-based. Partner notification is a vital strategy for STI control; however, its implementation is hindered by sociocultural, structural, and systemic factors.
methodsThis study forms part of a sequential exploratory mixed-methods investigation that assessed youth perceptions and social dynamics affect the partner notification strategies to control curable STIs in Maseru, Lesotho. The present article reports findings from the qualitative phase of the study. Data were collected through four focus groups, each comprising six to ten purposively sampled participants aged 18–24 years, and were conducted between June and July 2025. The data were collected in two 24-hour facilities in Maseru.
resultsThematic analysis was employed to interpret the data. The study identified four major themes: (1) perceptions on partner notification, (2) social and relational dynamics influencing partner notification, (3) perceived barriers to STI partner notification, and (4) preferred partner notification methods before and during the relationship.
conclusionThe youth in Maseru demonstrate an understanding of STI transmission and generally maintain positive attitudes toward partner notification services. However, the process of disclosure is influenced by factors such as stigma, fear of relationship dissolution, anticipated violence, and confidentiality concerns. They also expressed preference for specific methods of partner notification, both before and during relationships. Key recommendations underscore the importance of prioritizing confidentiality and adopting gender-sensitive approaches within youth-responsive partner notification services in Lesotho. Health systems are advised to incorporate digital platforms and integrate risk screening processes. The establishment of sexuality education and community stigma reduction initiatives is essential for enhancing disclosure among young individuals. Further research into alternative notification strategies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.