ArticleBMC health services research2026
Caregivers as essential members of healthcare teams: lessons learned from enforcement of the "no visitors" policy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- "Doing extra work and not getting extra help": the burden of work generated to manage the "no visitors" policy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought to the forefront caregivers’ unmeasured, unpaid work. Despite increasing recognition of caregivers as essential care-partners, during the pandemic, “no visitor” hospital restrictions prevented caregivers from engaging in their pivotal role within the healthcare system. This qualitative research aimed to better understand the wider effects of the pandemic on cancer care in Ontario, Canada with a focus on the experiences of cancer patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and healthcare decision-makers (leaders in oncology who direct care, manage units, and/or supervise frontline staff) to capture multiple perspectives on caregiving.
methodsOne-on-one, semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 32 participants across two hospitals. Participants were 18 years of age or older and had received, supported, or provided cancer care services during the pandemic, at one of the two hospital study sites. Interviews and focus groups were audio and video recorded and then transcribed. Inductive, codebook thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke’s six steps.
resultsCaregivers were found to be central to in-hospital person- and family-centred care. Their absence and the corresponding gaps in care highlighted their work as integral to comprehensive healthcare. Without caregivers present to absorb and communicate complex information, instructions were often missed or misunderstood by patients. Caregivers were also needed to help with advocacy and challenging navigation of the healthcare system. They alleviated some of healthcare providers’ workload through their work as porters, translators, and nursing and mental health support—responsibilities which were then foisted onto healthcare providers who were over-capacity and unable to absorb the extra work. The “no visitors” policy created barriers to caregivers, causing moral distress, negative emotional impacts, and created or redistributed essential care work in harmful ways.
conclusionsThe exclusion of caregivers resulted in an extra burden of work for healthcare providers. This reinforced the idea that caregivers are essential members of the in-hospital healthcare team whose presence facilitates more efficient and quality care. When healthcare providers were unable to absorb this burden of work, patient care quality and experience often declined. Caregiver presence is therefore essential for quality, person- and family-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.