Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965623›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Caregivers as essential members of healthcare teams: lessons learned from enforcement of the "no visitors" policy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada.

Danielle Jacobson, Arija Birze, Elizabeth Mansfield, Mehdi Ammi, Walter P Wodchis, Kerry Kuluski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Danielle JacobsonInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, 2085 Hurontario St, Mississauga, ON, L5B 1M8, Canada. danielle.jacobson@thp.ca.
Arija BirzeInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, 2085 Hurontario St, Mississauga, ON, L5B 1M8, Canada.
Elizabeth MansfieldInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, 2085 Hurontario St, Mississauga, ON, L5B 1M8, Canada.
Mehdi AmmiSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
Walter P WodchisInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, 2085 Hurontario St, Mississauga, ON, L5B 1M8, Canada.
Kerry KuluskiInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, 2085 Hurontario St, Mississauga, ON, L5B 1M8, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 179909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought to the forefront caregivers’ unmeasured, unpaid work. Despite increasing recognition of caregivers as essential care-partners, during the pandemic, “no visitor” hospital restrictions prevented caregivers from engaging in their pivotal role within the healthcare system. This qualitative research aimed to better understand the wider effects of the pandemic on cancer care in Ontario, Canada with a focus on the experiences of cancer patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and healthcare decision-makers (leaders in oncology who direct care, manage units, and/or supervise frontline staff) to capture multiple perspectives on caregiving.

methodsOne-on-one, semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 32 participants across two hospitals. Participants were 18 years of age or older and had received, supported, or provided cancer care services during the pandemic, at one of the two hospital study sites. Interviews and focus groups were audio and video recorded and then transcribed. Inductive, codebook thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke’s six steps.

resultsCaregivers were found to be central to in-hospital person- and family-centred care. Their absence and the corresponding gaps in care highlighted their work as integral to comprehensive healthcare. Without caregivers present to absorb and communicate complex information, instructions were often missed or misunderstood by patients. Caregivers were also needed to help with advocacy and challenging navigation of the healthcare system. They alleviated some of healthcare providers’ workload through their work as porters, translators, and nursing and mental health support—responsibilities which were then foisted onto healthcare providers who were over-capacity and unable to absorb the extra work. The “no visitors” policy created barriers to caregivers, causing moral distress, negative emotional impacts, and created or redistributed essential care work in harmful ways.

conclusionsThe exclusion of caregivers resulted in an extra burden of work for healthcare providers. This reinforced the idea that caregivers are essential members of the in-hospital healthcare team whose presence facilitates more efficient and quality care. When healthcare providers were unable to absorb this burden of work, patient care quality and experience often declined. Caregiver presence is therefore essential for quality, person- and family-centred care.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19NeoplasmsPatient Care TeamAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Visitors to PatientsCancer careCaregiversCOVID-19Healthcare teamPatient- and family-centred care

Identifiers

PMID41965623
PMCPMC13196094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.