ArticleBMC oral health2026
Prosthetic restoration patterns and patient satisfaction among partially dentate adults in Jordan: a cross-sectional correlational study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTooth loss affects quality of life, requiring prosthetic restoration to restore function and aesthetics. Patient satisfaction varies by treatment type and sociodemographic factors, but data on prosthetic restoration patterns and satisfaction among partially dentate populations in Jordan remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the pattern of and degree of satisfaction with prosthetic restoration among partially dentate patients in Jordan.
methodsA cross-sectional correlational study was conducted across Jordan from September 2022 to June 2023. The data were collected from adult patients at institutions, including government, private, and teaching clinics. The questionnaire covered sociodemographics, behavioral habits, and clinical assessments of missing and restored teeth. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, chi-square tests, and regression models were used to analyze restoration status and satisfaction (p < 0.05).
resultsOf the 463 participants, the mean age was 42.4 years (SD = 13.8), with 45.8% being male. A total of 55.9% of the participants had at least one tooth restored, with fixed partial dentures (FPDs) being the predominant type of restoration (65.9%), followed by implants (17.6%) and removable partial dentures (RPDs) (16.5%). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03–1.07; p < 0.001), female sex (aOR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.05–2.38; p = 0.03), and higher education (aOR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.24–2.8; p = 0.003) were associated with a greater likelihood of tooth restoration. Satisfaction was significantly greater in females than in males (B = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.06–0.96; p = 0.03) and among those treated with FPDs (B = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.34–1.60; p = 0.003) and implants (B = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.12–1.7; p = 0.02) than in those treated with RPDs.
conclusionsIn this national clinic-based sample of partially dentate adults in Jordan, fixed partial dentures were the most frequently observed prosthetic restoration type, followed by implant-supported restorations and removable partial dentures. Satisfaction scores were higher for fixed partial dentures and implants than for removable partial dentures. In multivariable analyses, age, female sex, and higher education were associated with having at least one restored tooth, and female sex and restoration type were associated with satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.