ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Antimalarial cabamiquine inhibits blood-stage of different field isolates of Plasmodium species.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malaria remains a major public health concern in Sub-Saharan Africa. The widespread and emerging drug resistance calls for urgent development of new drugs with novel modes of action to treat, control, and eliminate malaria. Cabamiquine, a promising antimalarial drug candidate that inhibits protein synthesis, has demonstrated promising potency across multiple life stages of P. falciparum. Here, in Ghana and Mali, we assessed the ex-vivo susceptibility of non-falciparum malaria field isolates of P. ovale and P. malariae to cabamiquine, in comparison to P. falciparum and explored the candidate drugs potential cross-resistance with existing antimalarial drugs. Thus, cabamiquine susceptible and selected resistant P. falciparum laboratory strains and field isolates were tested against a panel of antimalarial drugs. P. ovale isolates displayed a decreased susceptibility to DHA (median IC50 = 3.962 nM; IC50 range of 0.6587 to 9.154 nM) when compared to P. falciparum (p = 0.0371), but no significant difference was noticed for cabamiquine against both species (P. ovale: median IC50 = 0.9441 nM; IC50s ranged of 0.225 to 2.315 nM). Conversely, P. malariae isolates were less susceptible to cabamiquine (median IC50 = 3.915 nM; range 1.410 to 7.010) compared with P. falciparum (p = 0.001). There was no difference in susceptibility to DHA, both for P. malariae (median IC50 = 7.641 nM; range of 2.510 to 1268 nM) and P. falciparum isolates. With regards to the cabamiquine-resistant parasites (wild-type (WT) and mutants), there was limited variation between their susceptibilities to amodiaquine, tafenoquine, sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine, pyronaridine, active amodiaquine, lumefantrine, pyrimethamine, chloroquine, primaquine, and quinine. Overall, P. ovale and P. malariae are susceptibility to cabamiquine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.