ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Application of luminescence-producing Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains for evaluating anti-tuberculosis drug and vaccine efficacy in vitro and in vivo.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), remains a major public health problem worldwide. The development of effective drugs and vaccines remains crucial but the prolonged culture period of M.tb hampers this process. This limitation has been addressed by developing a bioluminescent M.tb strain that can be used to measure bacterial burden in live animals non-invasively and in real time. We investigated whether bioluminescence real-time imaging technologies could be used to monitor the infection process in live mice, with the aim of facilitating TB research.
methodsIn this study, we constructed bioluminescence-expressing M.tb strains. We compared the growth of these recombinant reporter and wild-type (WT) strains to confirm their stability in vitro. BALB/c mice were infected via intranasal or intravenous routes and monitored using an In Vivo Imaging System. The efficacy of isoniazid treatment was assessed using bioluminescence imaging and confirmed using colony-forming unit (CFU) assays. In a separate experiment, BCG-vaccinated and naïve control mice were infected with M.tb L5-Lux, a recombinant strain that expresses luxCDABE under the L5 promoter derived from the L5 mycobacteriophage. Vaccine efficacy was assessed by comparing bioluminescence and CFU counts.
resultsThe M.tb L5-Lux strain showed stable growth and a strong bioluminescent signal comparable to the WT strain. In both infection models, bioluminescence intensity strongly correlated with bacterial load. Isoniazid treatment led to a significant reduction in luminescence and CFU. In the vaccine study, BCG-vaccinated mice exhibited lower in vivo and ex vivo bioluminescence and approximately 0.5 log₁₀ lower CFU counts than naïve controls, demonstrating the utility of the M.tb L5-Lux strain for vaccine efficacy assessment.
conclusionsThe M.tb L5-Lux bioluminescent reporter strain provides a sensitive and efficient tool for monitoring M.tb infection and evaluating anti-TB drug and vaccine efficacy in real time. This imaging-based platform facilitates faster and more ethical preclinical testing by reducing the number of animals and experimental duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.