ArticleBMC genomic data2026
Distinct physiological and transcriptomic responses between tolerant and susceptible rapeseed (Brassica napus) germplasm to flooding stress.
Article in BMC genomic data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Waterlogging and submergence are major abiotic stresses impairing rapeseed development and hence evaluation of submergence tolerance ability is crucial for the development of tolerant lines through breeding approaches. This study investigated submergence impact on the survival rate, physiological responses, and transcriptomic variation of the young seedlings of 706 Brassica napus germplasm. We identified 57 highly tolerant and 109 highly susceptible accessions underwent six days submergence. Most accessions originated from the downstream of Yangtze River region had higher tolerance level. SOD enzymic activity increased both in the five representative tolerant and susceptible genotypes under submergence stress. POD activity also increased in the tolerant genotypes whereas CAT activity decreased, showing a opposite trend compared to the susceptible genotypes. The tolerant genotypes showed less chlorosis and produced less malondialdehyde than that in the susceptible group, while soluble protein content increased more than that in the susceptible genotypes. Transcriptome analysis detected 5,072 and 5,063 up-regulated genes, as well as 3,512 and 3,889 down-regulated genes in the tolerant / susceptible group in comparison to their respective control. Many genes encoding the transcription factors in AP2/ERF, bHLH, MYB, WRKY, and NAC families were also significantly regulated. The differentially expressed genes shared by the two pairs comparison were mainly enriched in such KEGG pathways as circadian rhythm, tryptophan metabolism, and porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism. The specific pathways in the tolerant group were enriched in carbon metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and biosynthesis of amino acid, while the susceptible group was more distributed in hormone signal transduction, sucrose and starch metabolism, and vitamin B6 metabolism etc. The results uncovered distinct physiological and transcriptomic differences between tolerant and susceptible genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.