Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965491›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026

Deep learning-based classification of nitrate and nitrite concentrations from water samples using colorimetric test strip images.

Muhammad Roman, Mazhar Sher, Chamika Kuruppuarachchi, Arshid Ali, Chulwoo Pack, Azlan Zahid, Ali Mirzakhani Nafchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad RomanDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Mazhar SherDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA. mazhar.sher@sdstate.edu.
Chamika KuruppuarachchiDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Arshid AliDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Chulwoo PackDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Azlan ZahidDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, Dallas, TX, 75252, USA.
Ali Mirzakhani NafchiDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate monitoring of nitrate and nitrite concentrations in water is essential for sustainable agriculture, safeguarding public health, and protecting aquatic ecosystems from nutrient pollution. Traditional methods for detecting nitrate and nitrite in water samples are precise but costly, complex, and time-consuming, limiting their practicality for frequent on-site testing. This research proposes deep learning-based computer vision techniques to classify nitrate and nitrite concentrations using images of colorimetric test strips. An RGB IMX219 camera was used to acquire images of colorimetric test strips under standardized, controlled illumination conditions to ensure consistent image quality. A total of 1938 nitrate images and 1190 nitrite images were collected before augmentation. After preprocessing and training-only data augmentation, both classical machine learning baselines based on hand-crafted color and texture features and deep learning models-including a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural networks (AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, and GoogLeNet)-were trained and evaluated using an independent test set and stratified fivefold cross-validation. For nitrate classification, ResNet18 and GoogLeNet achieved near-perfect 100% test accuracy, with mean cross-validation accuracy of 99.97% ± 0.04%, substantially outperforming classical baseline models based on hand-crafted color and texture features, which achieved at most 83.5% test accuracy. For nitrite classification, GoogLeNet achieved the strongest overall performance, with a test accuracy of 97.48% and a fivefold cross-validation accuracy of 95.22% ± 1.17%, substantially outperforming the best classical baseline model, which achieved a maximum test accuracy of 83.19%. These results demonstrate that deep CNN-based feature learning provides a significant performance advantage over simpler methods under controlled imaging conditions, supporting the suitability of the proposed system for rapid, image-based water quality assessment and motivating future evaluation under broader real-world deployment scenarios.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEnvironmental MonitoringNitratesNitritesWater Pollutants, ChemicalClassification AlgorithmsColorimetryConvolutional Neural NetworksNitratesNitritesWater Pollutants, ChemicalDeep learningImage classificationPrecision agricultureWater quality monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41965491
PMCPMC13070070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.