ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and temporal validation of 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma using the SEER database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for most primary liver cancers and displays substantial variability in survival outcomes. Existing staging systems, such as the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), and China Liver Cancer Staging (CNLC) systems, often fail to capture individual heterogeneity. Additionally, many published prognostic models rely on small cohorts, predict survival at only a single timepoint, or lack temporal or external validation. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, we developed and temporally validated multi-timepoint Cox models to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival in HCC. A total of 3850 patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2022 were included for model development and internal testing, and 2268 patients diagnosed in 2016–2017 formed an independent temporal validation cohort. Age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, fibrosis status, AJCC stage, and surgical treatment were identified as independent prognostic factors and incorporated into a multi-timepoint nomogram. The model achieved C-indices of 0.762, 0.760, and 0.726 in the training, test, and temporal validation cohorts. Time-dependent AUCs at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.814, 0.801, and 0.780 in the training cohort; 0.824, 0.809, and 0.807 in the test cohort; and 0.794, 0.793, and 0.779 in the temporal validation cohort, demonstrating consistently strong discrimination. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed accurate agreement and clinical benefit. These findings indicate that the proposed model provides a robust tool for individualized survival prediction and risk-stratified clinical decision-making in HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.