Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965445›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Using causal machine learning and real world data to improve dose response decision making for secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis.

Uta Kiltz, Thomas Glassen, Jan Brandt-Juergens, Ferenc Kiss, Daniel Peterlik, Benjamin Gmeiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Uta Kiltz *Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Thomas Glassen *Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.
Jan Brandt-JuergensRheumatologie, Schwerpunktpraxis, Berlin, Germany.
Ferenc KissNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.
Daniel PeterlikNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.
Benjamin GmeinerNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany. benjamingmeiner@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized treatment in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remains challenging, particularly in guiding dose escalation decisions. We applied a causal machine learning framework to real-world data from the AQUILA study to evaluate the impact of secukinumab dose escalation (150 mg to 300 mg) on disease activity and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Using double machine learning, we estimated both average and patient-level conditional treatment effects (CATEs) based on 42 baseline variables, including demographics, laboratory values, disease activity, HR-QoL, comorbidities, and prior treatments. 41.4% of patients receiving the higher dose showed greater improvement in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) scores compared to the lower dose (mean reduction: 1.81 vs. 1.44). Subgroup analysis revealed a 28% HR-QoL gain in patients with elevated body mass index (BMI) or C-reactive protein (CRP). The model predicted that approximately 75% of patients would benefit from dose escalation. These findings demonstrate the utility and scalability of causal machine learning for quantifying individualized treatment effects and guiding personalized treatment decisions in PsA. The approach is transferable to other chronic conditions, supporting more precise, data-driven care in real-world clinical settings.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedArthritis, PsoriaticMachine LearningAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedsecukinumab

Identifiers

PMID41965445
PMCPMC13076753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.