Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965423›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Knowledge stickiness and technological concentration in the AI industry: an empirical study of Chinese cities.

Lin Zhang, Quanjun Zhang, Houyuan Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lin ZhangChina-ASEAN School of Economics, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Quanjun ZhangChina-ASEAN School of Economics, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Houyuan MengCollege of Ethnology and Sociology, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning, Guangxi, China. 1436577860@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of AI in China has proceeded to an uneven pace across cities. In this study we develop a motivation-resistance framework to help study AI knowledge stickiness: motivation in capturing within-city diffusion potential, while resistance captures frictions preventing knowledge transfer across cities and inducing local lock-in. Combining AI patent applications with urban statistics in a city-year panel for the years 2014-2023, and using a two-way fixed-effects model, we find an inverted U-shaped association between AI knowledge stickiness and technological concentration, where higher stickiness up to a limit leads to more concentration and thereafter the opposite. Technological complexity moderates this nonlinear association by altering its strength and curvature, rather than indicating a simple and uniform shift in the turning point. In heterogeneity analyses, the nonlinear pattern is more clearly detected in eastern cities and in small and medium-sized cities, while the evidence for large cities is weaker because the quadratic term is not statistically significant. Collectively, these results show that local embedding conditions shape the internal allocation of AI activity along mapped sub-technology branches, with implications for place-based AI innovation policy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIndustryKnowledgeChinaCitiesHumansArtificial intelligenceKnowledge stickinessTechnological complexityTechnological concentration

Identifiers

PMID41965423
PMCPMC13230755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.