ArticleScientific reports2026
Nuclear energy green growth and green innovation effects on ecological footprint in the top fifteen nuclear energy using countries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent developments in the literature reveal that nuclear energy, as well as renewable energy, can be used to combat environmental degradation. However, it is a fact that this literature, which focuses on the relationship between nuclear energy and environmental degradation, does not include green growth and green innovation in environmental pollution models. In order to fill this gap in the literature, our study analyzes the nuclear energy-ecological footprint relationship by using 1994–2021 panel data of 15 leading countries in nuclear energy consumption and adding the variables in question to the empirical model. The long-term estimates are explored using the FMOLS, DOLS, and AMG estimators. The causality analysis is carried out by the Dumitrescu-Hurlin bootstrap causality procedure. In the long run, it is found that nuclear energy consumption, green growth, and green innovation improve environmental quality by mitigating the ecological footprint. Since natural resources and economic growth encourage the ecological footprint, they have a detrimental effect on environmental quality. Causality analysis points to unidirectional causality from nuclear energy consumption, green innovation, and natural resources to the ecological footprint. Additionally, a bidirectional causal linkage is detected between green growth, economic growth, and ecological footprint. The empirical findings obtained from the analysis can give important clues to the countries in question in the fight against environmental pollution. Especially in improving environmental quality, policymakers should focus on proposals focused on nuclear energy, green growth, and green innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.