ArticleScientific reports2026
A fuzzy logic model for taxi service assessment using passenger survey data from Ukraine and Poland.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Taxi service quality is traditionally assessed using objective metrics like waiting time, cost, and comfort. However, contemporary research confirms that subjective psychological factors significantly influence service perception. This study develops an interpretable Mamdani fuzzy inference system (TEC model) that maps three passenger psycho-emotional factors—Trust, Empathy, and Control—into an interaction level (0–100) and a corresponding 1–5 star rating for taxi trips. The model is parameterized using a questionnaire survey in Ukraine (n = 118) and Poland (n = 101) and examined through a pilot case study of 10 real trips in Kharkiv and Gdansk. In the pilot, the model-based star ratings were largely consistent with app ratings; the relative error was 6.67% and is reported as a descriptive indicator only. The framework is intended for offline diagnostic assessment and scenario-based improvement planning rather than real-time prediction. Further validation on larger and more diverse samples is required to quantify generalizability. The novelty of this research lies in translating a passenger’s subjective psycho-emotional perceptions into quantitative indicators, which increases the reliability of taxi service quality assessment. The results are significant for taxi services and the logistics of their operations, providing a deeper understanding of the psychological factors that influence ratings. Furthermore, this approach can be used by digital taxi platforms for more effective service management. The work demonstrates the potential of fuzzy logic to improve predictive accuracy, develop personalized strategies, and create a foundation for intelligent decision support systems to enhance taxi services in European cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.