ArticleScientific reports2026
Field dissipation, dietary risk assessment, and soil fate of chlorantraniliprole and abamectin (dual-active formulation) in watermelon under field conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chlorantraniliprole and abamectin are frequently applied in combination for pest management in cucurbit crops; however, field-based residue data for their joint use on watermelon remain limited. The present study evaluated the dissipation behaviour, soil residues, and dietary exposure implications of a dual-active formulation (chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + abamectin 1.7% SC) applied to watermelon under supervised field conditions. Fruit samples were collected at 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 15 days after the final application, and soil samples were collected at harvest. Residue analysis was performed using LC-MS/MS following modified QuEChERS extraction with matrix-matched calibration. The analytical method demonstrated satisfactory performance, with linearity (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.