ArticleScientific reports2026
An optimized gradient boosting framework for IoT intrusion detection: a comprehensive evaluation on the CICIoT2023 dataset.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- XAI-Driven Intrusion Detection for Internet of Things Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An optimized gradient boosting framework for IoT intrusion detection: a comprehensive evaluation on the CICIoT2023 dataset.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A dataset-centric review of IoT and IIoT intrusion detection: realism, evaluation biases, and future research directions.Frontiers in big data · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) generates high-volume network traffic that is heterogeneous and highly imbalanced, creating a critical need for intrusion detection systems (IDS) that remain accurate under resource-constrained edge gateways. This study presents an optimized gradient-boosting IDS framework evaluated on the CICIoT2023 benchmark. The pipeline integrates stratified undersampling to mitigate class imbalance and gain-based feature selection to remove redundant flow attributes. We evaluate the framework across three tasks: binary detection, 8-class attack-family classification, and 34-class fine-grained classification. Across all tasks, the evaluated models achieved strong detection performance with low inference latency; specifically, XGBoost attained 99.61% accuracy and a 0.995 macro-F1 score in binary detection with 0.355 µs/sample inference time. Feature selection reduced the input space from 46 to 23 dimensions, and an ablation study showed that this reduction decreased inference latency by 30–51% and training time by 33–40% while keeping accuracy variation within ± 0.014% points. These results indicate an accuracy–efficiency trade-off suitable for real-time deployment. All datasets, code, and results are publicly available to facilitate reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.