ArticleNature communications2026
An information content principle explains regulatory patterns of gene expression across human tissues.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A DRACH Observed/Expected Metric Reveals the Evolutionary Landscape of Epitranscriptomic Regulation Across Bilateria.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene expression ranges from broadly expressed to tissue-specific patterns, with many genes displaying intermediate specificity. Understanding how regulatory architecture scales with tissue specificity can reveal fundamental principles of genome regulation. By analyzing cis-regulatory element counts across human genes with varying tissue specificity, we identify a non-monotonic pattern: genes with intermediate specificity harbor the most regulatory elements, suggesting distinct regulatory strategies across the expression spectrum. We apply the Minimum Description Length principle from information theory, and maximum parsimony from phylogenetics, to quantify regulatory demand underlying expression patterns. This measure scales consistently with cis-regulatory element counts, transcription factors, microRNAs, and gene structure, and distinguishes switch-like regulation in selectively expressed genes from fine-tuning regulation in broadly expressed genes. Regulatory element abundance peaks in genes of intermediate evolutionary age. Regulatory architecture appears to scale with informational costs, suggesting that the genome operates as a decompression device, where regulation is dictated by minimally required complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.