Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965371›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Frost damage segmentation in grapevine organs using YOLOv11s with ASPP and dynamic confidence thresholding.

Kaan Arık, Erdal Büyükbıçakcı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaan ArıkInformation Technologies of Vocational School, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey. kaanarik@subu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0930-8955
Erdal BüyükbıçakcıInformation Technologies of Vocational School, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7276-741X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change, particularly increasing frequency and intensity of spring frost events, poses a serious threat to viticulture by reducing yield and product quality. This study proposes an image processing and machine learning-based framework for early, rapid, and accurate segmentation of frost damage in vineyards using YOLOv11s enhanced with Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP). A unique dataset called FGVL dataset from Sultana seedless grape vineyards in Manisa, Türkiye, following a severe frost event in April 2025. FGVL includes 418 frost-damaged grapes, 510 frost-damaged leaves, 395 healthy grapes, and 698 healthy leaves, all manually annotated by experts under natural field conditions. By integrating ASPP into YOLOv11s, proposed model improved multi-scale contextual feature extraction and achieved mAP@50 of 0.7686, demonstrating stronger performance in instance segmentation of small, overlapping, and visually similar grapevine organs. In addition, Dynamic Confidence Thresholding (DCT) strategy was introduced to improve prediction reliability in dense and visually complex vineyard scenes. Despite challenges such as background clutter, object overlap, and small target structures, model maintained stable performance with low computational demand, requiring only 6.45 GB of GPU memory. Proposed framework offers an accurate, efficient, and practically deployable early recognition system for frost damage assessment in viticulture.

Indexed as

FreezingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlant LeavesVitisMachine LearningAtrous spatial pyramid poolingDynamic confidence thresholdingFrost damage recognitionGrapevine organ segmentationViticultureYOLOv11

Identifiers

PMID41965371
PMCPMC13230912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.