ReviewJournal of leukocyte biology2026
Tissue context as a determinant of trained innate immunity: a conserved molecular toolkit with divergent functional outputs.
Review in Journal of leukocyte biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trained innate immunity (TI) challenges the traditional view that adaptive immune cells are solely responsible for establishing immune memory. Instead, innate immune cells can develop a form of memory through persistent epigenetic, metabolic, and antimicrobial modifications, enabling them to respond to secondary challenges in a nonspecific manner. While the molecular mechanisms underlying this trained response have been extensively characterized and are well understood, the intrinsic cellular programs driving trained immunity have not been clearly delineated. Further, the influence of tissue-specific microenvironments remains underexplored. Evidence indicates that the heterogeneity observed in trained immune responses is partly attributable to the functional outcomes shaped by trained immunity within diverse tissue microenvironments, underscoring the complexity and context-dependent nature of this adaptive process. In this review, we explore that TI uses a conserved molecular toolkit whose functional output is dictated by tissue microenvironment. Signals such as oxygen tension, microbiota, local metabolites, cytokine release, and damage-associated molecular patterns can also shape trained innate immunity. The resulting outcomes range from increased antimicrobial defense to maladaptive responses that lead to chronic inflammation and tissue damage. Together, we synthesize findings from hematopoiesis and tissue-resident macrophage biology, emphasizing how immunometabolism and epigenetic mechanisms underpin tissue-specific models of TI. This comprehensive framework resolves contradictions observed across different organs and disease states, positioning tissue instruction as a pivotal determinant of innate immune memory. It demonstrates that trained immunity programs are intricately adapted to tissue niches, with profound implications for infection control, inflammatory diseases, tissue regeneration, and the precise therapeutic targeting of innate immune cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.