Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41965071›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

gMISpy: integration of complex regulatory networks and genome scale metabolic models.

Carlos J Rodriguez-Flores, Naroa Barrena, Loïc Paulevé, Francisco J Planes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos J Rodriguez-FloresTecnun School of Engineering, University of Navarra, San Sebastián 20018, Spain.
Naroa BarrenaTecnun School of Engineering, University of Navarra, San Sebastián 20018, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4324-3371
Loïc PaulevéUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, LaBRI, UMR 5800, Talence F-33400, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7219-2027
Francisco J PlanesTecnun School of Engineering, University of Navarra, San Sebastián 20018, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1155-3105

Funding

Basque Government PIBA_2020_01_0055Minister of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain PID2022-143298OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGenome-scale metabolic models lack explicit regulatory mechanisms, limiting their predictive accuracy for genetic interventions. Current methods for computing genetic Minimal Cut Sets either ignore regulatory networks entirely or use simplified acyclic representations that cannot capture regulatory feedback loops, ubiquitous features critical in cellular modeling.

resultsWe developed gMISpy, a Python package that that enables efficient computation of genetic Minimal Intervention Sets (gMISs) in integrated genome-scale metabolic and regulatory networks. gMISpy incorporates cyclic regulatory logic into our previous computational framework using layered Boolean networks and BoNesis framework, resulting in a more accurate modeling of how regulatory interactions affect metabolic genes. Benchmarking across four different regulatory networks with Human-GEM showed consistent improvements in prediction accuracy, with Matthews correlation coefficient gains ranging from 2.50% to 14.42%. Validation against cancer data from DepMap and Project Score confirmed that cyclic integration reduces false positives and better captures biological vulnerabilities compared to acyclic approaches. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/PlanesLab/cyclic-gMISpy.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenomeGenomicsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalSoftwareHumans

Identifiers

PMID41965071
PMCPMC13125755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.