ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
gMISpy: integration of complex regulatory networks and genome scale metabolic models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGenome-scale metabolic models lack explicit regulatory mechanisms, limiting their predictive accuracy for genetic interventions. Current methods for computing genetic Minimal Cut Sets either ignore regulatory networks entirely or use simplified acyclic representations that cannot capture regulatory feedback loops, ubiquitous features critical in cellular modeling.
resultsWe developed gMISpy, a Python package that that enables efficient computation of genetic Minimal Intervention Sets (gMISs) in integrated genome-scale metabolic and regulatory networks. gMISpy incorporates cyclic regulatory logic into our previous computational framework using layered Boolean networks and BoNesis framework, resulting in a more accurate modeling of how regulatory interactions affect metabolic genes. Benchmarking across four different regulatory networks with Human-GEM showed consistent improvements in prediction accuracy, with Matthews correlation coefficient gains ranging from 2.50% to 14.42%. Validation against cancer data from DepMap and Project Score confirmed that cyclic integration reduces false positives and better captures biological vulnerabilities compared to acyclic approaches. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/PlanesLab/cyclic-gMISpy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.