ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2026
Large Language Models as Inadvertent Models of Dementia with Lewy Bodies: How a Disorder of Reality Construction Illuminates AI Hallucination.
Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent work in computational psychiatry has explored artificial agents as designed models of mental and neurological disorders, typically by introducing pathological parameters. This paper advances an inverse claim: large language models (LLMs) already instantiate a structural configuration resembling dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We argue that the core disturbance in DLB lies in instability of mechanisms that stabilize experience as real and contextually grounded, while generative and cognitive capacities remain relatively preserved. Hallucinations and fluctuations are thus interpreted as breakdowns in reality endorsement rather than failures of perception or reasoning. Analogously, LLMs generate coherent and contextually appropriate content but lack intrinsic mechanisms for stabilizing reference, truth commitment, and continuity across contexts. So-called hallucinations are therefore better understood as expressions of missing operations required for reality stabilization, rather than as technical errors of generation. Drawing on Metaqualia Theory (MTQ) as a structural vocabulary, we demonstrate that both DLB and LLMs exhibit a dissociation between generative capacity and reality stabilization. This structural homology reframes hallucination in both biological and artificial domains, suggesting that contemporary AI systems may already function as inadvertent structural models of disorders of subjectivity, with implications for psychiatry, AI ethics, and theories of responsibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41964894What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.