Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41964863›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2026

The Influence of the Environment and the Use of Woody Plants: New Evidence for the Ecological Apparency Hypothesis.

Karina Costa de Almeida, Reinaldo Farias Paiva de Lucena, Julio Marcelino Monteiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karina Costa de AlmeidaLaboratório de Etnobiologia e Conservação (LECON), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação (PPGBC), Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Campus Amílcar Ferreira Sobral (CAFS), Floriano, Piauí, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-1136-2282
Reinaldo Farias Paiva de LucenaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento (PRODEMA), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Joao Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1195-4315
Julio Marcelino MonteiroLaboratório de Etnobiologia e Conservação (LECON), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação (PPGBC), Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Campus Amílcar Ferreira Sobral (CAFS), Floriano, Piauí, Brazil. juliommomteiro@ufpi.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0001-7753-6258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ecological Apparency Hypothesis (EAH) was initially proposed to understand herbivore foraging choices in the face of plant diversity. Based on this premise, the hypothesis was adapted to humans, proposing that more apparent plant species are more frequently used by people compared to less apparent ones. This study aimed to assess whether the EAH explains the selection and use of woody species in an ecotone area. The research was conducted in the Ausente Community, Barão de Grajaú, Maranhão, Brazil. A phytosociological inventory was carried out using the plot method, covering an area of 0.75 ha. In parallel, free listing and semi-structured interviews were conducted with local residents to identify useful species and their associated uses. The inventory recorded 930 tree individuals from 14 species, with a predominance of the Fabaceae family. Free listing and interviews involved 107 residents and revealed 115 ethnospecies with 140 use citations. Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) were used to test whether phytosociological parameters were related to the use value (UV) of species and to assess the applicability of the EAH across use categories. The results indicated that the EAH explained plant resource selection only for the forage category, with no significant results for the other use categories or for general use value in relation to phytosociological parameters. Therefore, it is concluded that the EAH alone does not adequately explain the selection of plant resources by community members, which may be influenced by cultural and socioeconomic factors specific to each community.

Indexed as

PlantsSociological FactorsWoodAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiodiversityBrazilEcologyEcosystemEnvironmentFemaleHerbivoryHumansInterviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41964863
PMCPMC13070075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.