ReviewCurrent urology reports2026
Unequal Access to Novel Systemic Therapies for Bladder Cancer: A Global Analysis of Clinical Trials of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
Review in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis narrative review evaluates ongoing clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) for bladder cancer (BC), with a focus on the global distribution of trial activity and equitable access to participation. We examined whether populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are proportionally represented in these studies and summarized the most frequently studied agents and emerging combination strategies. The search and inclusion of clinical trials were conducted up to October 2025. RECENT
findingsPembrolizumab and Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) are the most extensively investigated agents in ongoing BC trials. Pembrolizumab is being evaluated as monotherapy and in combination regimens, with late-phase studies demonstrating improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). EV has shown high response rates, particularly among patients with prior treatment failure, and is increasingly studied in combination with checkpoint blockade. However, the majority of these trials are conducted in high-income countries, limiting global access and raising concerns regarding applicability across diverse healthcare settings. These trends reflect a shift toward personalized and targeted therapeutic approaches in advanced BC. ICIs and ADCs have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies for BC, with pembrolizumab and EV demonstrating particular potential. Yet, current clinical trial activity remains heavily concentrated in high-income regions, underscoring a need for expanded research infrastructure and enrollment capacity in LMICs. Broader geographic inclusion and continued evaluation of combination regimens may enhance global relevance and improve equitable access to emerging treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41964855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.